<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For the Grey&#8217;s Fans&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poptheology.com/2007/05/for-the-greys-fans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poptheology.com/2007/05/for-the-greys-fans/</link>
	<description>Where religion meets pop culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:49:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.poptheology.com/2007/05/for-the-greys-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 05:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poptheology.com/?p=80#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I am quite the Grey&#039;s Anatomy fan, though I was sorely disappointed with last week&#039;s two hour episode and the spin-off show.  In fact, every Grey&#039;s fan I&#039;ve talked to was disappointed with the episode and felt ripped off by the sneak peak preview for the spin-off show featuring the character of Addison.  
As a feminist I find myself struggling with some of the very issues that the author mentions regarding Grey&#039;s and another favorite of mine, Sex and the City.  As of late I have been grappling with what it means to find and use my voice, innately female, in the &quot;man&#039;s&quot; world of academia and parish ministry.  Echoing the critique of Grey&#039;s Anatomy I wonder why it is that a woman cannot be portrayed as one who has it all together: relationships, career, sexually, and in a family setting.  It seems that chaos must inevitably exist in one of these four categories in order for a female character to be likable.  If she has it all together, she typically portrayed as too aggressive or bitchy.  
Perhaps I am merely projecting my own personal quandaries onto the sitcoms that captivate much of pop culture.  I am not sure, but I am certain that an authentically female voice still struggles to be heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite the Grey&#8217;s Anatomy fan, though I was sorely disappointed with last week&#8217;s two hour episode and the spin-off show.  In fact, every Grey&#8217;s fan I&#8217;ve talked to was disappointed with the episode and felt ripped off by the sneak peak preview for the spin-off show featuring the character of Addison.<br />
As a feminist I find myself struggling with some of the very issues that the author mentions regarding Grey&#8217;s and another favorite of mine, Sex and the City.  As of late I have been grappling with what it means to find and use my voice, innately female, in the &#8220;man&#8217;s&#8221; world of academia and parish ministry.  Echoing the critique of Grey&#8217;s Anatomy I wonder why it is that a woman cannot be portrayed as one who has it all together: relationships, career, sexually, and in a family setting.  It seems that chaos must inevitably exist in one of these four categories in order for a female character to be likable.  If she has it all together, she typically portrayed as too aggressive or bitchy.<br />
Perhaps I am merely projecting my own personal quandaries onto the sitcoms that captivate much of pop culture.  I am not sure, but I am certain that an authentically female voice still struggles to be heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

